Sunday, June 26, 2016

When you catch a ride using Uber or Lyft, you do so at your own risk.
Under terms and conditions that riders agree to — but few read — at sign up, the app-based ride-hailing companies say they aren't legally liable for the safety of their drivers or the quality of their services. That's because the drivers are independent contractors, not employees.
The terms seem to be at odds with company statements that highlight their efforts to keep riders safe with driver background checks, a code of conduct and other measures.
Instead, if a rider is injured in a ride-hailing car, the driver appears to be liable. If a driver gets lost and makes a rider late for an appointment, or if a driver assaults someone, the company says it's not involved.
Uber "does not guarantee the quality, suitability, safety or ability of third-party providers (drivers)," its terms say. Riders also agree that the "entire risk arising out of your use of the services, and any service or good requested in connection therewith, remains solely with you."
"That's just a real eye opener," says Stephen Saltzburg, a law professor at George Washington University and frequent Uber user, who admits he didn't read the terms. "If Uber is so confident in the checks and all of this, why is it so anxious to try to shift liability to the user?"
Lyft's terms say it has "no control over the quality or safety of the transportation that occurs as a result of the services." The company also tells drivers that they are responsible for all liability. "The language in the terms of service is a reflection of the reality that people using the platform are on the open road in moving vehicles, which presents a risk," spokeswoman Alexandra LaManna says.
Uber doesn't take on the liability risk of drivers because they are independent contractors, which is common in many industries, says spokeswoman Taylor Patterson. "It doesn't detract in any way from the fact that we take safety very seriously," she says.
Uber's app shows riders the driver's name, license plate number, photo and ratings from other riders. The app also lets friends track a route in real time, says Patterson.
Both Uber and Lyft carry $1 million in liability insurance that covers each driver while en route to pick up a passenger or while carrying one. The policy becomes the primary insurance covering the driver.
Several apps that summon taxicabs have liability waivers in terms and conditions that are similar to Uber and Lyft. But many taxis are different. Riders in New York City who get cabs in conventional ways, for instance, do not have to agree to any terms, said Allan Fromberg, spokesman for the city taxi commission.
The liability waivers also are being tested in court. Read More

Fine Print Says Riders Can't Blame Uber for Unsafe Drivers

Saturday, June 25, 2016

BOSTON —
A convicted sex offender was working as an Uber driver ferrying Boston-area
passengers, FOX25 Investigates uncovered.
Massachusetts State Police confirm a trooper stopped a driver in a Kia Sorrento at Boston Logan Airport on Thursday and they plan to issue a court summons for driving with a suspended license, revoked registration and canceled insurance.
FOX25 Investigates has learned that driver, 54-year-old Ronald Deluca, is a Level 2 sex offender, according to public records obtained from the North Andover Police Department.
Deluca’s driving record is 18 pages, detailing a variety of citations, including speeding, license suspensions, and traffic violations.
Efforts to reach Deluca at his North Andover home were unsuccessful.
A spokesperson for Uber emailed the following statement about the incident to FOX25:
“The account of the driver involved in the alleged incident has been put on hold while we review further. We are reaching out to local law enforcement to assist in their investigation in any way we can." 
So far, no one with Uber has explained how its background checks didn’t flag a driver without a valid license or registration. Uber has also declined to explain how a registered sex offender was cleared to drive for the company.

FOX25 Investigates sex offender driving for Uber in Boston

Monday, June 13, 2016

Uber and Lyft have been criticized world-wide for having inadequate insurance, licensing and insufficient background checks for its drivers. Being a 40-billion Company, we don’t know if it is, Uber is trying to push its way in to the Transportation Industry without respecting the Laws and Regulations. They are still allowed to operate even though they are violating the most important laws (Licensing and Commercial Insurance) of Transportation Industry.

Please review the website www.whosdrivingyou.org for awareness on Ride-Sharing Companies

Insurance alerts have been posted by various states to warn the potential customers about risks associated with riding with Ride-Sharing Companies. Uber and Lyft have been misleading their Customers, Government Bodies and even their own drivers. The Uber/Lyft drivers are operating in their personal vehicles carrying Personal Insurance. The TN Department of Insurance has issued a warning in Insurance Gaps provided by TNCs and that there will be no coverage under Drivers Personal Policy. Many Insurance Companies are cancelling the Personal Insurances of Drivers who are working for Ride-Sharing Companies. Taxi Cab drivers have started reporting the Uber & Lyft drivers to their Insurance Companies. More information is available on these sites regarding said Insurance Scams.


The Company (James River Insurance) that issues the supposedly Uber 1-million-dollar policy is based out of Bermuda and it is not recognized in many of the US States including Tennessee. James River is a surplus line Insurer which is not admitted, not regulated and not registered under any State Guarantee Fund. The insured party is Raiser LLC which is the payment processor for Uber therefore there is no coverage for the driver or passenger in an accident.  The shady details of the policy can be read on the following websites



Please be careful of who is driving you and do not jeopardize your life or lives of your loved ones in favor of cheaper rides. 

Insurance Scam of Ride-Share Companies

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

UBER IS A TRADITIONAL employer recruiting employees. Or Uber is a non-employer facilitating the work of independent contractors. Or Uber is a technology company supplying an app to small businesses.

It depends on which lawsuit you read. The company, valued at over $62 billion, changes its description of what it does depending on what best allows it to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

In a series of cases over the past year, Uber has denied that the roughly 400,000 people who work as Uber drivers — and are paid by Uber for those services — are employees of the company. The company took that position in numerous class-action lawsuits in California, Massachusetts, and Florida.

The California Labor Commission ruled last June that an Uber driver is an employee, however, and therefore entitled to benefits under labor law like reimbursement for expenses and overtime pay. The class actions in California and Massachusetts settled for $100 million, with the company agreeing to policy changes around deactivating drivers and recognizing a “Driver’s Association” to bring complaints of drivers to the company’s management.

But a separate spate of lawsuits, the most recent released this week, accuse Uber of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by text-messaging advertisements without “prior express written consent.” The text messages say things like “You’re invited to drive Uber. No schedule. No boss. Sign up now and get a $500 bonus.”...

To Avoid Regulations, Uber Describes Itself as Either, Neither and Nor

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Uber has your home address. It has the addresses of the places you want to get to. It knows when you’re going to church, to your boyfriend’s house, to the union hall, to the doctor’s office. And if you’re a driver for Uber, it’s tracking you for hours and hours each day.

We talk a lot about NSA surveillance, National Security Letters, warrant canaries, facial recognition technology, a police van disguised as a Google Maps vehicle, the war against encryption, and government-mandated backdoors. And yeah, sure, the expansive net of government surveillance is really troubling. That’s why organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation put out “Who’s Got Your Back” reports, grading the technology industry on how they treat user privacy.

But these reports look at how the tech industry responds to government surveillance. Ultimately, the EFF gave Uber five out of five stars—endorsing the company as one that “has your back.” Government surveillance is nothing to sneeze at, but reports like these implicitly turn a blind eye to the astounding privacy invasions that companies like Uber regularly engage in, all on their own—and not for purported national...

Uber Knows Too Much About You

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

An Uber driver accused of sexually assaulting a female passenger earlier this year will face additional
charges, including an accusation that he sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl.

John Sanchez, 53, is scheduled to appear in court Thursday afternoon, and 10News learned he is suspected in five other sexual assault cases.

RELATED: Team 10: Warrant details alleged sexual assault by Uber driver

In late February, a woman told police that an Uber driver, later identified as Sanchez, sexually assaulted her while she was on a first date. Following the reported incident, Uber immediately suspended Sanchez and barred him from driving for the company.

After an investigation, Sanchez was arrested in March on suspicion of sexual assault.

Authorities told 10News that Sanchez now faces an additional five counts of rape of an unconscious person, charges of giving drugs to a minor and accusations that he told a victim or witness not to go to authorities.

According to authorities, all of the alleged attacks happened in the city of San Diego. However, investigators believe only the most recent alleged attack happened while Sanchez drove for Uber.

An Uber spokesperson told 10News the company did a standard criminal background check on Sanchez prior to hiring him. The spokesperson added that the company would not change their protocol in light of the new allegations against Sanchez.

Read More at: http://www.10news.com/news/uber-driver-accused-of-sexual-assault-faces-more-charges-052616?utm_content=buffer402ee&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Uber driver accused of sexual assault faces more charges

Monday, May 23, 2016

A surge has been recorded in violent crimes against London taxi drivers, prompting a fresh spat between Uber and black cabs over who is to blame.

New figures from Scotland Yard reveal that violent offences against taxi drivers have risen by more than two-thirds, from 856 in 2014 to 1,403 last year. Black-cab drivers have blamed Uber for the increase, alleging that “poor English” and the inadequate street knowledge of drivers working for the taxi-hailing app company have generated so much frustration among passengers that it has led to violence.

Uber has dismissed the criticism, explaining that many private-hire drivers had switched to working with Uber because of the app’s safety features, with every trip tracked by GPS and electronically recorded .

The Metropolitan police figures show that since 2012 – when Uber arrived in London – the total number of violent crimes has doubled from 709 in 2012. Most of these cases were of common assault, followed by cases of assault with injury, and then harassment.

Read More- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/21/uber-taxi-london-crime

Black cabs blame Uber for rise in attacks on London’s taxi drivers